\usepackage{emoji}

Early Warnings of Regime Shifts

School on biological physics across scales: phase transitions

Juan C. Rocha
Associate Professor

Outline

  1. Discussion
  2. Early warning signals:
    • Critical slowing down
    • Flickering
    • Critical speeding up
    • Long term memory & potential analysis
    • Spatial patterns
  3. Break
  4. Do they work?
    • forest
    • water

Discuss

  1. What are early warning signals?
  2. What is suitable of early warning signals?
  3. What needs to be in place for you to trust them?





05:00

Regime shifts and resilience

Magnitude of change that a system can absorb without undergoing a regime shift

  • Size of the basin of attraction
  • Depth
  • Slope
  • Proximity to the boundary

  • Property of the system or the regime (state variable)?
  • Property of the disturbance?
  • Resilience of what to what? for whom?

Holling C. 1973. Ann Rev Ecol Syst -> Clark, W 1975 IIASA
Menck et al 2013 NatPhys
Carpenter et al 2001 Ecosystems

Back to theory: Where is the tipping point?

\[\frac{d🐠}{d⏱️}=🐠 \left( 1- \frac{🐠}{🌎} \right) - 🎣 \left( \frac{🐠^2}{🐠^2+1} \right)\]

Different ways of tipping

Slow - fast systems

  • B-tipping: bifurcations
    • Saddle, Folk, Hopf, pitchfork…
  • N-tipping: noise induced (stochasticity)
    • Noise type
  • R-tipping: rate induced
    • Basin does not change

Most early warnings are tailored to B-tipping, limited applications for N- and R- tipping

Resilience indicators

Resilience indicators

  • \(\Delta\) Variance and autocorrelation
  • \(\Delta\) skewness and kurtosis
  • Model-based indicators:
    • Diffusion jump models
    • Time varying AR(p) models
    • Threshold AR(p) models
    • Potential analysis
  • Spatial indicators:
    • Fourier transforms
    • Power spectrum
    • Patch-size distributions

Dakos et al. 2012. PLoS ONE
Kéfi et al. 2014. PLoS ONE.

Resilience indicators

Critical slowing down

Verbesselt J, et al. Remotely sensed resilience of tropical forests. 2016.

Resilience ~ slowness

  • \(\uparrow\) Variance and autocorrelation
  • NDVI: normalized difference vegetation index
  • VOD: vegetation optical depth
  • Limited spatial and temporal resolution
  • Confirm a threshold: 1500mm

Limitations: fail when dynamics are driven by stochastic processes or when signals have too much noise

Hastings & Wysham. 2010. Ecology Letters

Critical speeding up

  • \(\downarrow\) Variance and autocorrelation
  • Tailored for stochastic transitions

Titus & Watson 2020 J Theor Ecol

Exit time

  • Mean exit time: average time it takes to leave the basin for first time
  • The potential derived includes state-dependent stochasticity
  • You can compute confidence intervals
  • Applications in lakes (plankton), and climate
  • Time series with multiple shifts
  • Useful for fast systems

Arani et al 2021 Science

Potential analysis

  • How many basins has the potential landscape?
  • Statistically infer by fitting polynomials at different time windows
  • Time series with multiple shifts
  • Useful for fast systems

Levina & Lenton 2010 Clim Past

Model selection

Applications in climate (ice cores 60kyrs)

  • Red: 1 basin
  • Green: 2 basins
  • Cyan: 3
  • Purple: 4

Flickering

  • \(\Delta\) Skewness and Kurtosis
  • System explore alternative states
  • Biases the distribution towards new attractor
  • Increase or decrease
  • Only works on fast systems

Fractal dimension

  • \(\uparrow\) adaptive capacity
  • Measure of self-similarity across scales
  • Fractal geometry:
    • Bounded
    • Magnitudes do not depend on scale
    • Clear interpretation
  • Applications in medicine

West, Bruce. 2010. Frontiers Physiology
Gneiting et al. 2012. Statistical Science.

Spatial patterns

Spatial patterns

  • One real pattern, but multiple possible generative models
  • Bayesian approach to chose generative model
    • similarity of models on feature space
  • Back to theoretical model: how close is the instance to tipping?
  • Approximation in real life setting

Questions?

Where on Earth are regime shifts likely to occur?

Depends on our ability to observe and measure resilience

  • Terrestrial:
    - Gross primary productivity (2001:2018) - Ecosystem respiration (2001:2018) - Leaf area index (1994:2017)
  • Marine:
    - Chlorophyll A (1998:2018)
  • >1M pixels, weekly obs, 0.25 degree grid resolution

Critical slowing down

  • \(\uparrow\) Variance and autocorrelation
  • \(\Delta\) skewness and kurtosis

Dakos et al. 2012. PLoS ONE; Kéfi et al. 2014. PLoS ONE

Critical speeding up

  • \(\downarrow\) Variance and autocorrelation

Titus & Watson 2020 J Theor Ecol

Fractal dimension

  • \(\uparrow\) adaptive capacity
  • Measure of self-similarity across scales

West, Geoffrey. 2017. Scale; Gneiting et al. 2012. Statistical Science.

Analysis: one pixel

The generic resilience indicators do not necessarily align with critical slowing down or speeding up theories: higher co-dimensions (multiple drivers).

Detection

In the absence of ground truth, if \(\Delta\) is > 95% or < 5% of the distribution is considered a signal of resilience loss

~30% of ecosystem show symptoms of resilience loss, boreal forest and tundra particularly strong signals

~25% of ecosystem show symptoms of resilience loss, Easter Indo-Pacific and Tropical Eastern Pacific Oceans particularly strong signals

Others

Less than 30% agreement across studies – Runge et al 2025 GCB

Lenton et al 2022 Smith & Boers 2023

Forzieri et al 2022 Feng et al 2021

Discuss:

  1. Why do you think there is so little agreement?
  2. Can these assessments be trusted? If yes, where?
  3. If not, how would you improve it?





05:00

Contradictory signals?

Attempts to validate: triangulation

Permutation test

Attempts to validate: triangulation

Compare with alternative methods

XAI methods to explore detection of EWS:



  • If CSD was the main route to tipping, only one driver should be of high predicting value and it should be the slope of the linear trend
  • Multiple factors, and multiple scales of influence are at play
  • Experiments showed that under higher co-dims, increase/decrease in Var and AC1 can be expected

Machine learning

Trained on synthetic (low dim) models, researchers know when collapse occurred – truncate

Machine learning

Trained on synthetic (low dim) models, researchers know when collapse occurred – truncate

Machine learning: R-tipping

Challenges

  • Most progress is based on CSD approach (B-tipping)
  • There is some improvements with ML, but not accuracy assessment against ground truth
  • Do EWS work?

Early warning signals don’t predict forest die-offs

Nielja Knecht

Early warning signals don’t predict forest die-offs

Nielja Knecht

Resilience of the water cycle: Single metrics are not enough

Romi Lotcheris

Lessons


  • Measuring resilience from data is an open problem
    [B-tipping, N-tipping, R-tipping]
  • Benefit from ML and XAI approaches to quantify accuracy and uncertainty
  • But it needs to be trained on observations, not synthetic models
  • Open invitation to explore collaborations

Reach out:

Summary

  • Early warning signals
    • Evolving field, mainly focused on CSD
    • B-tipping, N-tipping, R-tipping…
  • ML hold promises
    • Better than other statistical approaches (but trained on synthetic models)
    • Still focused on CSD, with one paper on R-tipping
    • Open question if they work on real world settings
  • EWS have low accuracy
    • Ground truth: forest die-offs
    • Ground truth: break points in water variables
    • How to improve them? – open area of research